Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Showing posts with label driving. Show all posts
Showing posts with label driving. Show all posts

Saturday, March 30, 2013

A wife was making a breakfast of fried eggs for her husband.Real-Men-poster-Salame-English


Suddenly, her husband came into the kitchen.


“Careful,” he said, “CAREFUL! Put in some more butter! Oh my GOD! You’re cooking too many at once. TOO MANY! Turn them!


TURN THEM NOW! We need more butter. Oh my GOD! WHERE are we going to get MORE BUTTER?

They’re going 2 STICK! Careful.. CAREFUL! I said be CAREFUL!


You NEVER listen to me when you’re cooking! Never! Turn them! Hurry up! Are you CRAZY? Have you LOST your mind?


Don’t forget to salt them. You know you always forget that. Use the salt. USE THE SALT! THE SALT!”


The wife stared at him. “What is wrong with you? You think I don’t know how to fry a couple of eggs?”


The husband calmly replied, “I just wanted to show you what it feels like when I’m driving.”



A real man opens the car door for his wife… I did it while driving at 90mph

Friday, March 22, 2013

PAL-V has come out with the first flying car


I’m not psyched at all when I hear about electric cars of the future but I was freaking exciting when I’ve heard that there’s a Dutch company called PAL-V (which stands for Personal Air & Land Vehicle) that has designed and already tested the first viable flying car that meets all regulations for both flying and driving which is called PAL-V One.


We’ve been dreaming of flying cars ever since we were little kids and watched our first science fiction movie and finally there’s a company that really wants to turn this into reality. A flying car would be the ultimate vehicle to go wherever and whenever, avoiding traffic jams, busy highways, crossing over lakes, rivers or mountains like an eagle. Then you’ll just land and drive to your final destination.


The PAL-V One combines within one vehicle the freedom and excitement of flying like a bird in the sky with the choice of driving with breathtaking performances on the roads and highways. It looks like a small helicopter but it’s actually an ultra slim and aerodynamic three wheeled car and gyroplane that can take off like any helicopter.


It’s apparently cleared to fly below 4,000 feet so there’s no commercial air traffic interference and it’s equipped with a powerful gasoline engine that could take it to flying and driving speeds of 112 mph. If that’s not truly awesome then I don’t know what is.. The first tests went great and in the next years we might even see this one on the streets. Gotta start raising money.



 




Source: Brosome



PAL-V has come out with the first flying car

Sunday, March 17, 2013

This year, each of my grown children and I have been involved in auto accidents. Each of the cars was old enough that a moderate hit was more expensive to repair than an insurance company figures the car is worth. Our experiences varied and might surprise you.


No collision insurance


My son was looking for an address and failed to see the light turn red. A car T-boned his on the passenger side. His liability insurance paid for the other car’s damage, but he carried no collision and comprehensive insurance for his own car. After all, goes one traditional line of logic, the car is 15 years old and was paid off years ago. That’s all true, but that didn’t mean he could afford to replace the car, even for one of the same value that his was before the accident. No, his only option was—and still is—to keep on driving it as-is while he saves up for a replacement. He is fortunate that the car still runs, drives and doesn’t even leak in the rain, although doors on that side are unusable.



Uninsured motorist collision insurance


My daughter was merrily driving down a multi-lane road when an SUV came off a side road and hit her car in the passenger side. Traffic was just too busy for the SUV to get all the way across several lanes without running into somebody, and she was in the way. The other driver’s insurance had lapsed, so she invoked her own uninsured motorist protection. Her insurance company paid the replacement value for her 17-year-old car, minus a $250 deductible.



Why was she carrying such a low deductible? Because she drives a lot, in heavy traffic, sometimes spiritedly, and has absolutely zero cushion in the bank to replace her car should anything happen to it.


Low deductible insurance


My own accident was my own fault; I took a corner too fast and slid into the curb in the center median. It damaged the suspension and frame, which is enough for insurance to write-off a 30-yr-old Toyota. But I wasn’t about to write it off. It was a full convertible—one of only 900 Toyota convertibles in 1981—that I had restored myself. I never lock the car since I would rather have a thief use the door handle than slit the top with a knife. That, along with custom upholstery and paint is part of why I carried $100 deductible. Another big reason is that my insurance is only charging me $50 per year for collision and comprehensive with $100 deductible. So I was able to have the frame straightened and the suspension repaired, and still end up with $700 insurance money in my pocket. Now if I can just keep out of trouble for at least three years, my rates won’t go up!


High deductible insurance


This wouldn’t be complete without stating that I carry $1,000 deductible on my wife’s Lexus. She doesn’t drive as crazy as the rest of us, the logic goes, so she is less likely to cause an accident. And they weren’t giving me any price break on that car like on the old Toyota. So wouldn’t you know—a cedar tree falls on her car while she’s driving it! Seriously! The damage estimate—approximately $10 less than the deductible! Oh, and the tree was on my own property, and my homeowner’s policy has the same $1,000 deductible! If that isn’t amazing enough, it was later that night that our son called to tell us about his accident (above), but now I’ve digressed.



SHOULD YOU CARRY COLLISION INSURANCE ON AN OLDER CAR?

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Wednesday, February 27, 2013


The economics of fuel prices and driving involve the kind of algebra most of us forgot after high school graduation, but the effects remain all too real. Here’s the latest example: Americans spent a bigger share of their household income on gasoline in 2012 than at any point in the past 30 years — even though they were driving shorter trips in more fuel-efficient vehicles.


According to the U.S. Energy Information Agency, the average American household spent $2,912 on gasoline in 2012, or just under 4 percent of pre-tax income. That’s just a tick higher than in the recession-hit 2008, and the highest level since the early 1980s. As the chart above shows, things were even worse in the late 1970s, when 5 percent of paychecks went into gas pumps.

If you think it’s because people have stepped away from their computers long enough to start driving more, you’d be half-right; after a dip during the recession, Americans likely drove 2.95 trillion miles in 2012, just off the pre-recession high. But drivers have been racking up those miles in ever more efficient cars, with total gasoline sales in 2011 of 134 billion gallons reaching the lowest level since 2001.

The real culprit lies with higher gas prices, which the EIA says rose 26 percent in 2011 and another 3.3 percent in 2012 to a city average of $3.70 a gallon. That increase overwhelmed any gains from more efficient driving and outpaces the still sluggish growth in personal incomes. The agency expects gasoline prices to fall slightly this year and next as oil companies add new supplies — but the EIA’s predictions can’t anticipate the occasional hurricane or exploding oil rig that have sent prices soaring in years past. If you’re buying a new car, and aren’t sure how much to pencil in for gas costs, you’d be wise to assume more than what you’re paying today.

Via: Autos.yahoo.com/blogs/motoramic/


Gas costs claim largest share of American income in 30 years

Monday, February 25, 2013

Because the world can’t get strange enough, an animal training school in New Zealand has set out to prove that dogs have enough smarts to drive cars at low speeds, given weeks of instruction and a special set of paw controls. This video suggests they’ve succeeded, finally answering the question of what dogs would do if they ever caught a car they were chasing.

Arranged by the New Zealand chapter of the Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the stunt involved three dogs — Monty, Ginny and Porter — either found, roaming stray or given up by their owners. The SPCA, working with animal trainer Animals on Q, adapted a Mini Cooper to canine steering and put the pets through eight weeks of intensive training to teach them how to stop, go, steer and change gears.

According to the New Zealand Herald, SPCA hopes to use the driving dogs to showcase how intelligent its rescue animals are, and that they’re suited for work as helpers or just family pets. Next week, the SPCA will let the trio take a driving test on live national television in New Zealand, or as Down Under cats will call it, “armageddon.”

Submit to StumbleUpon

Dogs taught to drive by animal shelter; cats left to their own defenses